|
It was discussed and
approved that Mr. Stanford would proceed with the
excavation and resetting of the valve at the end of Donzi Trail. Mr. Stanford stated that this will be
accomplished as soon as an excavator could come and complete the work. Mr. Stanford reported that the
system is working very well. The tap at 105 Denwood occurred without problem a leak was
found and repaired near 124 Daniwood Grove. He showed the Directors a piece of plastic
pipe removed from the area. One section of the joint had duct tape
around it. He has no way of knowing if
the pipe was originally installed that way or if that is an earlier
repair. Either way, the duct-taped joint
appeared to have been leaking for some time then finally failed..
A discussion was held regarding
re-drilling well #5. In his
report, Mr. Stanford expressed concern over the
easement for Well #5 and the owner of lot 9. The Directors directed Mr. Stanford to write a letter
to the lot owner putting her on notice that the well was being re-drilled and
asking for her cooperation regarding use of her driveway.
Mr. Stanford
raised some additional concerns regarding the area
around Well #5. He feels that the area
may be considered alpine wetlands by the Army Corps of Engineers and that the
District should verify that before any drilling begins. He agreed to talk to Terry McKee of the Army
Corps of Engineers Director
Jordan feels that there will be sufficient income from taxes to pay the June
bond payment, so some of the funds in Colorado Trust could be used to
re-drill the well, or at least start the process of re-drilling the well.
Mr. Stanford stated that the
well is not necessary at this time. He
recommended that the District wait until its financial status is more secure
and re-evaluate the situation again in May or June. Mr. Rupp recommended that
the District proceed with the process of re-drilling the well
now, and then proceed in stages, as District funds will allow, for
the remainder of the work necessary to get the well online and running. This way, a good portion of the
work would already be done and the critical time factor would be greatly
reduced, the well would already be drilled, should the District
need additional water productionit. He also suggested that there maymight
be ways to save money on the new well by detailed
analysis and selection of the precise
well site, in engineering costs or by
using some of the existing underground piping for
conduit to run wires, etc. to the pumphouse.
Director Jordan questioned
why the District doesn’t re-drill well #3 instead. At the present time, well #3 is working
fine but well #5 has been shut down due to possible surface water
contamination.
Mr. Stanford will meet with
Dave of Black Mountain Drilling regarding their time frame for drilling. After a discussion, it was determined to
specify a 6” hole with a 4” casing. regarding this issue.
Mr. Stanford
also has concerns about bog-like area that Well #5 is in. In his
experience, there is at least a 60% chance
that wells in this type of area produce poor-quality
water. If that was the case, there
is no room at the well site for a water treatment plant and the District
cannot afford to treat the water. Another water
district in the area recently had this same problem.
The Directors
discussed other options – re-drilling well #3 or drilling a new well. The pros and cons of all the options were
discussed. The well
valley and recreational areas are both solid rock and not suitable for a new
well. Well #3
could be a good possibility, as it sits on the Divide Gravels. Re-drilling that well may increase water
production; however, it is impossible to tell at this point. A private well
in that area produces 12 gpm, which is a significant
increase over the current production of well #3 at 1.5 to 3 gpm.
Director
Jordan again stated that the District could probably afford to
drill one well but certainly not two wells. He asked if the District really needed to
increase production. Mr. Stanford
stated that the feels the District does not need to increase
production and will have sufficient water for the summer, even with
additional taps. He strongly suggests that the District save
as much money as possible during the next year, and put that aside for future
wells. The leak
that was just repaired was losing approximately 9000 gallons a
day, and the wells were able to keep up without problem.
The Directors
directed Mr. Stanford to contact the Army Corps of Engineers regarding the
wetland issue, and not to contact the owner of lot 9 at the present time.Mr. Stanford
also reported that a letter had been received from the
homeowner at 747 Kutsu Ridge Road whose home
had recently burned. They are
requesting that they not be charged a water service fee for the next three
months until they can assess what their course will be. A motion was made and carried that AquaTest
should write a letter to the homeowner approving their request
and asking them to write again in three months if they need more time or if
they are ready to resume receiving bills.
Mr. Stanford
also reported that we have numerous homes where the owner did not turn their
water meter and remote over to the District at the time the District was
created. AquaTest was instructed to
identify those homes and work toward each one receiving a new letter asking
them to sign the meter over and include the costs involved for them if the
need would arise for it to be replaced.
Regarding
the Camp Iana Eeasement, Mr. Rupp spoke with Terry
of Colorado Springs Utilities (CSU). The District's 2”
main of the Districtsproperty has been plotted to depth and
position. Mr. Rupp asked for a copy of
the information, from CSU,,
so he could approach Camp Iana for the easement.
Regarding
the Augmentation and Exchange Water Court Decree, Mr. Stanford stated that he
has met withthe Jim Felt, Highland Lakes
Water District’s attorney. As far as
Mr. Felt is concerned, Highland Lakes will not oppose the Decree as long as
the scope has not changed from what he and Mr. Stanford discussed. Anyone opposed to the Decree has until
February 28, 2005 to filestate their Statement of
Oopposition.
Regarding
the Trout Haven Resort Easement for the Vacated Roadway Property, Mr. Rupp
has not had an opportunity to pursue this any further at this time due to his
work schedule.
Annual
Administrative Resolution:
The
Directors reviewed the Annual Administrative Resolution as revised by Seter
& Vander Wall. A motion was made
for the Board to approve the Annual Administrative Resolution as
revised. The motion was seconded and
unanimously carried. The
President and the Acting Secretary signed the document.
The
Directors discussed the Trout Haven promotional letter. Director Walker will retype the letter to
make it more professional and formal in tone, and email the revised letter to
everyone for their review.
There being no further
business to come before the Board, and upon motion duly made, seconded and
unanimously carried, the meeting was adjourned at 8:40 PM.
_________________________________________
Secretary for
the Meeting
|